Wednesday, June 24, 2009

QUESTION FROM A READER

The Ice House CoverA reader, S.C., emailed to ask who gets the money for the stolen Lincoln stamp mentioned last week. The "Ice House" cover (envelope) that bore the stamp was stolen in 1967. Aetna Insurance paid the owner, J. David Baker, $86,000 to cover the loss of the Ice House cover and about 250 other covers that were stolen at the same time. Most of the stolen covers were found and returned in 1978. In 2006 a couple claimed to have found the cover while they were sorting through a dead friends' estate. Another source says the couple claimed they bought the cover at a flea market. The couple took the envelope to a stamp shop in Chicago where it was identified and the police were contacted. The statute of limitations had expired on the 1967 theft, so the case went to court. Who owned the stamp -- the finders, the original owners, the insurance company, or another collector who had offered to buy it when it surfaced? The insurance company had been involved in several mergers and the judge ruled it was no longer the same company that had insured the stamp. The collector had no proof he had purchased the rights to buy the stamp because those involved were dead. The ownership was finally awarded to the Baker estate in 2008. So the money, $431,250, went to the Baker heirs.

But the whole story is even more complicated. It is part of a real life detective drama involving a fine arts thief, the Chicago mob, a porn shop owner, a murder, a blackmail demand for the return of the stamp, and the suicide of a man who was accused of selling bogus collectibles. To this day no one admits to knowing where the stamp has been all these years.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Gosh, it sounds like a great book or movie in the making. How about Nicolas Cage as the story teller?

Anonymous said...

Sounds like the Bakers should have to reimburse some insurance company the original settlement amount and keep what's left over. They should be able to trace the mergers sufficiently. Otherwise this adds one element to the argument that "crime does pay" if you choose to steal your own items and wait for the statute of limitations to expire....

Silverbullet said...

Title for stolen goods should not pass to the 'new' finder/owner. The heirs should pay a 'finders fee' (10%?) to the last family in possession for finding/returning their collectible.

majeral said...

wow sounds like a good new TV series ...

Anonymous said...

I agree with another commenter, that this would make a great, multi-plot book AND movie! I think Tom Hanks would be perfect for some role in it...

Anonymous said...

the insurance company should be reimbursed for sure..........this is ridiculous...and finders should be given half the balance for finding it.... after all Bakers still have the stamp plus money....

Anonymous said...

my suggestion would be to donate the ill gotten gain to charity